Despite their outward appearances, can a clear distinction really be made between the monkey Ed and his human counterpart, Matt LeBlanc? In the film, excel at baseball (although the monkey is the star), both delight in flatulence, and both have giant cartoon teeth. "Ed" is not merely, as Brad Laidman of raved, " some would say that kids may like," but rather the examination of the symbiotic relationship between man and monkey. In "Ed" award-winning documentary filmmaker Bill Couturie employs the technique of cinema verite that lets the camera capture a true slice of sporting Americana. The movie was "Ed", not to be confused with the Whoopie Goldberg abortion of celluloid "Eddie", that premiered during that same year. To be a good kids' film this needed to have a bit of spark to it instead it brings to mind the fading embers on a dying fire.ĭespite persistent talk of Hollywood's "Golden Age of Cinema", movie-making did not truly reach its zenith until 1996. Ed has no personality and looks really creepy and the comedy and plot are both as unimaginative as you'd expect them to be. How people like Cobb, Warden and Caviezel must feel watching this is anyone's guess I suppose they were looking at it being a really big kids movie with the star of Friends, how could they lose? Overall I found this a rather dire experience. He plays second fiddle to a monkey and you can see that the confidence and comfort he enjoys in Friends, is absent here. Matt LeBlanc plays a character in the mould of Joey but without the good writers to support him. Secondly his face and his expressions make him look like a slightly crazy old man I wondered if children would take to this character or be slightly freaked out by him. First he never for once looks or moves like anything other than a guy in a monkey suit. Part of the film's problem is that Ed looks like two things and neither of them is a likeable monkey. The laugh was Cooper saying `oh, I'm gonna spank that monkey' and the half was Ed watching TV and seeing the episode of Friends with a monkey in it. We have the monkey dressing up and causing mayhem etc every scene feels like it is a template to which a baseball film has been applied! None of it is funny (for adults anyway) and must of it is just puerile I laughed once and half-laughed another time. While we're talking about lazy writing, how about the fact that every scene is a cliché. The plot is pointless here and no child would care anyway if you can't guess what will happen at the end then you are a fool! Will Cooper ever pitch again? What side will the coin fall on? Will Cooper and Ed bond? All these are givens and there is no enjoyment from watching the plot unfold exactly as you know it would. This film was shown in the UK at 11:30 at night! This was why I had taped it as I assumed it was more for adults than children, after all Clint Eastwood had done a couple of films with a monkey in it so why not? Watching I was left baffled as to why it was on so late at night when clearly the only people who would want to see it are children who will laugh at the sight of a monkey eating ice cream and dressing up. However Ed turns out to much more valuable to both the team and Cooper. Things get worse for him when the team drafts in a new mascot a monkey, Ed, and Cooper is selected to room with him. Sadly his pitching, so perfect in practice, is way off in the games. Jack Cooper is a pitcher on a minor league baseball team, hoping for a crack at the majors.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |